|
Integrated Management
of Grape Diseases
Use of Resistant Cultivars for Grape
Disease Management
In an integrated disease management program where
emphasis is placed on reducing overall fungicide use, it is essential
that any available disease resistance be identified and used. If
resistance is not available, we should at least identify and avoid
those cultivars that are highly susceptible to important diseases.
There are a few grape varieties with high levels of resistance to most
diseases. Norton (Cynthiana) is a variety that has great potential for
organic production in the southern portion of the Midwest. It has good
resistance to most diseases and in several commercial plantings,
growers rarely apply fungicides. Hopefully, new varieties with improved
levels of disease resistance will be introduced in the near future.
Unfortunately, resistance to most of the major diseases is not
available in most commercially grown grape cultivars in the Midwest.
Thus, the disease management program must rely heavily on the use of
cultural practices and efficient use of organically approved fungicides
or biocontrol agents or products. Whereas resistance is generally not
available for most diseases, some grape cultivars are known to be much
more susceptible to certain diseases than others (Table
2). For
example, the cultivar Chancellor is highly susceptible to downy mildew,
whereas downy mildew is seldom a serious problem on Concord and several
other cultivars. Growers should consider disease susceptibility before
establishing the vineyard. Segregating highly-susceptible cultivars
into blocks that can be easily treated separately allows growers to
apply more fungicide or other control agents when needed to highly
susceptible cultivars while reducing their use on less susceptible
cultivars. In addition, varieties differ greatly in their sensitivity
to copper and sulfur fungicides. When planting the vineyard, it is
important to isolate blocks of sensitive varieties from those that will
be sprayed with these materials.
In many situations, growers do not have the flexibility
of avoiding highly susceptible cultivars. The demand for a specific
wine, juice grape, or table grape cultivar generally dictates which
cultivars are planted. Whereas this situation usually cannot be
avoided, growers need to recognize that when highly- susceptible
cultivars are planted, their disease management options are greatly
restricted.
Table
2. Relative
disease susceptibility and Sulfur, and Copper sensitivity among grape
cultivars.
The
relative ratings in this chart apply to an average growing season under
conditions usually favorable
for disease
development. Any given cultivar may be more severely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susceptible or sensitive to |
| Cultivar |
BR |
DM |
PM |
Bot |
Phom |
Eu |
CG |
Als |
S1 |
C2 |
| Aurore
Baco Noir
Cabernet Franc
Cabernet Sauvignon
Canadice
Cascade
Catawba
Cayuga White
Chambourcin
Chancellor
Chardonel
Chardonnay
Chelois
Concord
Cynthiana/Norton
DeChaunac
Delaware
Dutchess
Elvira
Einset Seedless
Foch
Fredonia
Frontenac
Gewürztraminer
Himrod
Ives
Jupiter
LaCrosse
Leon Millot
Limberger
Maréchal Foch
Marquis
Mars
Melody
Merlot
Moore's Diamond
Muscat Ottonel
Niagra
Pinot gris
Pinot Meunier
Pinot blanc
Pinot noir
Reliance
Riesling
Rosette
Rougeon
Saint Croix
Sauvignon blanc
Seyval
Steuben
Traminette
Vanessa
Ventura
Vidal blanc
Vignoles
Villard noir
|
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+
+++
+
+++
+
++
++
+
+++
+
+
++
+++
+
+++
++
++
++
+++
++
+
++
+++
+
+++
++
+
+
+++
++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
++
++
?
+++
++
++
+
+++
++
+
+
?
|
++
+
+++
+++
++
+
+++
++
++
+++
++
+++
+
+
++
++
+++3
++
++
++
+
+++
+
+++
+
+++
+
++
++
+++
+
+++
+
++
+++
+
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
+++
++
+++
++
+++
++
+
++
++
++
++
++
+
|
++
++
+++
+++
+
++
++
+
+
+++
++
+++
+++
++
+
++
++
++
++
+++
++
++
++
+++
++
+
+++
++
+++
+++
++
+
+
+
+++
+++
+++
++
+++
+++
+++
+++
++
+++
+++
+++
++
+++
+++
+
+
++
++
+++
+++
+++
|
+++
++
+
+
++
+
+
+
++
+
++
+++
+++
+
+
+
+
+
+++
+
+
+
++
+++
+
+
+
+++
+
+
+
+
+
+
++
++
++
+
++
+++
++
+++
+
+++
+
++
++
+++
+++
+
+
+
+
+
+++
+
|
+
+
?
+++
?
++
+++
+
?
+++
?
+++
+++
+++
+
+++
+++
++
+
?
?
++
+
?
?
?
+
++
+
?
?
+++
+
?
+
?
?
+++
?
?
?
?
++
++
++
+++
?
?
++
?
?
+
+
+
++
?
|
+++
++
?
+++
?
++
+
+
?
+
?
++
+++
+++
?
+++
+
+
+
?
+++
?
?
?
?
++
?
?
+
+++
+++
?
?
?
+++
++
+++
+
+++
+++
?
?
?
++
++
+
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
+
++
?
|
++
+++
+++
+++
++
+
+
++
++
+++
++
+++
++
+
+
++
+
++
++
+
+
+
?
+++
?
+
?
?
?
+++
?
?
+
?
+++
?
+++
++
+++
+++
+++
+++
?
+++
++
++
?
+++
++
+
++
+
+
++
++
?
|
+++
++
?
?
++
?
+
++
?
+++
++
++
+++
+
?
+++
+
+
++
?
+
+
?
+
+
+
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
+
?
+
++
+++
?
?
++
++
?
?
+++
+
++
?
|
No
No
No
No
?
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
?
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
?
?
Yes
No
Yes
?
?
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
?
No
No
No
?
?
No
No
No
?
|
++
?
?
+
?
?
++
+
?
+++
?
+
+
+
?
+
+
?
++
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
++
?
?
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+++
+++
?
+
+
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
| » Key to susceptibility or
sensitivity: BR=black rot; DM=downy mildew; PM=powdery mildew; Bot=Botrytis; Phom=Phomopsis; Eu=Eutypa; CG=crown gall; ALS=angular
leaf scorch; S=sulfur; C=copper. |
| » Key to ratings: +=slightly
susceptible or sensitive; ++=moderately
susceptible or sensitive; +++=highly
susceptible or sensitive; No=not
sensitive; Yes=sensitive; ?=relative
susceptibility or sensitivity not established. |
1 Slight to
moderate sulfur injury may occur even on tolerant cultivars when
temperatures are 85 degrees. For higher during or immediately following
the application.
2 Copper
applied under cool, slow-drying conditions is likely to cause injury.
3 Berries not
susceptible. |