TBRT Abstract Submission


Posters and Oral Presentations

SUBMISSION DEADLINE: March 23, 2018 at 5:00 PM EST

We would like to invite you to submit an abstract for an oral presentation or poster presentation for the Tomato Breeders Round Table.

Graduate students and post-docs are encouraged to present at the TBRT. The TBRT Education Committee will use the abstracts and select the winner of the Gardiner-Scott graduate student travel award. The winner will be reimbursed with a full travel scholarship to the meeting.

In order to present a poster, the presenting author must do the following by March 23, 2018 at 5:00 PM EST.

  1. Register for the meeting
  2. Complete the Abstract submission and data sheet
  3. Receive an email indicating that the abstract has been approved

Abstract Information

  • Page format: 1-inch margins, letter-sized paper (8.5 x 11-inch), portrait orientation
  • Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt.
  • Line spacing: Single-spaced lines
  • All components of the abstract must fit on a single page
  • File format MS Word (*.doc or *.docx)

Abstract Structure

Starting at the top margin, include:
  • TITLE of abstract (ALL IN CAPITAL LETTERS).  Do not use bold face or underline. Center on page.
  • (Skip one line.)
  • Names and institutional affiliations of each author (see example for proper format). Center on page.
  • Denote the presenting author with a preceding asterisk (*), e.g., "* Firstname Lastname"
  • (Skip one line.)
  • Body of abstract. 500 words or less.
  • Full-justified (left and right justified).
  • Single-spaced.
  • Include significance of the work, objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
  • Do not include references.
Please follow the example below. Improperly formatted abstracts will be returned.
Abstract Submission is exclusively online.

 

ABSTRACT EXAMPLE:

EVALUATION OF HIGH ANTIOXIDANT CLONES AMONG PRODUCTION SITES

*Sarah Rosenthal, University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Horticulture; Shelley Jansky, USDA Vegetable Crops Research Unit; and Doug Rouse, University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Plant Pathology

An increasing interest in the antioxidant capacity of vegetables has led to the development of novel potato clones. However, little is known about the effect of production environment on antioxidant levels in potato. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of genotype  and  environment  on  antioxidant  activity  of  potato  tubers.  In  this  study,  three replications of 22 high antioxidant breeding clones (developed by C. Brown) and three controls (Yukon Gold, Russet Burbank, and Snowden) were planted in four environments: organic (no irrigation), organic (irrigation), conventional (central sands), and conventional (northern Wisconsin). Samples of freshly harvested tubers were diced into 1 cm cubes (including the pel), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until analysis. In addition, tuber samples were stored  at  5.6°C  for  four months  and  processed  similarly.  The  TEAC  (Trolox  equivalent antioxidant capacity) assay for evaluating antioxidant levels in human tissue was adapted for tuber tissue. Antioxidant activity was determined for all clones at all sites for both fresh and stored tubers. Antioxidant activity of fresh tubers at all locations was higher in 2006 than in 2005. Cooler late-season temperatures in 2006 may have been responsible for the increased levels of antioxidants.   Stored tubers had higher levels of antioxidant activity than fresh tubers, with a larger storage effect in 2005, when antioxidant levels in fresh tubers were lower. There was no consistent effect of production system (organic versus conventional) on antioxidant activity in tubers.  For the specialty potato clones we evaluated, antioxidant levels were generally highest in potatoes grown in high-yielding production environments, and they increased during storage. Therefore, potatoes with high nutritional value, in terms of antioxidant activity, can be produced using conventional production and storage systems.

[If two or more authors are at the same institution they should be separated by commas before the institution: Sarah Rosenthal, Shelley Jansky, USDA Vegetable Crops Research Unit; and Doug Rouse, University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Plant Pathology]